Mummy Dust!



-
*TheShadowWithen
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Golemaster also requires you to be Rich and level 30 with 0 ecl to get anything really useful out of it and is open to anyone


-
*Mymothersmeatloaf
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Not to mention Golem Master takes a dump all over your Spellcaster Level >_>TheShadowWithen,Jun 25 2017 wrote: Golemaster also requires you to be Rich and level 30 with 0 ecl to get anything really useful out of it and is open to anyone

-
*Tomekk
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
>Best companions in the gameMymothersmeatloaf,Jun 25 2017 wrote:Not to mention Golem Master takes a dump all over your Spellcaster Level >_>TheShadowWithen,Jun 25 2017 wrote: Golemaster also requires you to be Rich and level 30 with 0 ecl to get anything really useful out of it and is open to anyone
>Full spellcaster levels (which don t matter that much outside of DC casting)
Pick one :P

-
*Mymothersmeatloaf
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
I choose both because I summon the undeadzTomekk,Jun 25 2017 wrote: >Best companions in the game
>Full spellcaster levels (which don t matter that much outside of DC casting)
Pick one :P



-
*Emanon
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Again though, dynamically, the argument is still as it is.
Game design-wise, you're basically excluding the majority of the alignment spectrum from a general summoning feat over a word? (Which is strange since all the other general summons are flavored already.)
What sense does that make in terms of game design, honestly? This is not a class-feat tied to an ethos. This isn't a palemaster feat. It's a generic feat for a 24 hour bodyguard open to everyone... except those with roleplay.
There's no sense in excluding those with roleplay from a general feat (or forcing them to do something un-RPish to be competitive with those who enjoy having a 24 hour warrior).
Surely, anyone would concede "because name" is a weak argument to use for game balance and design. I've been on about half a dozen servers who've used "mummy dust" and keyed it to alignment, so I don't really think my argument is flawed.
... unless there's some good/neutral only uber neat-o epic feat I've missed here.
Game design-wise, you're basically excluding the majority of the alignment spectrum from a general summoning feat over a word? (Which is strange since all the other general summons are flavored already.)
What sense does that make in terms of game design, honestly? This is not a class-feat tied to an ethos. This isn't a palemaster feat. It's a generic feat for a 24 hour bodyguard open to everyone... except those with roleplay.
There's no sense in excluding those with roleplay from a general feat (or forcing them to do something un-RPish to be competitive with those who enjoy having a 24 hour warrior).
Surely, anyone would concede "because name" is a weak argument to use for game balance and design. I've been on about half a dozen servers who've used "mummy dust" and keyed it to alignment, so I don't really think my argument is flawed.
... unless there's some good/neutral only uber neat-o epic feat I've missed here.

